<%@ Language = VBscript %> <% response.buffer = true %> <% session("cookietest") = "success" DSN = "the-friend" set conn = server.createobject("ADODB.Connection") Conn.Open DSN SQL = "SELECT TOP 1 * FROM articles INNER JOIN pdfs ON articles.articledate = pdfs.pdfdate WHERE category = 1 ORDER BY articledate DESC" set entries = conn.execute(SQL) articledate = entries("articledate") %> the Friend - Independent Quaker journalism since 1843

April 01, 2008

centuries-old definitions surface

Bloggers have been let loose on the human fertilisation issue, to add to our confusion.

After our much-appreciated analysis of the debate (21 March), Eye's attention has been drawn to The Times faith blog which has unearthed many more interpretations of the status of the foetus from past theology.

Whereas in the translation of Exodus used by early church fathers a sentence of death was passed on anyone injuring a pregnant woman and causing her to lose her baby, only a fine was levied if the foetus was unformed, or not yet like a human being. Others, such as Basil, a Cappadocian Father, thought it was wrong to abort either a formed or unformed foetus.

St Augustine could not see a soul in the unformed foetus and St Thomas Aquinas went even further in not ascribing a soul to any foetus before forty days in males and ninety in females!

In 1869 Pope Pius IX seems to have levelled the centuries-old debate by abolishing laws that made a distinction between formed and unformed. It is pointed out to us that if the technology had been around before that time, the current bill would have had church sanction.

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

q-eye from The Friend

The collaborative online diary of The Friend: independent Quaker journalism from the UK since 1843. Currently in test stage, featuring items from the magazine and other bloggable snippets

Eye guide


Previous Posts

Mysterious worshipper

haiQ Corner

If you're happy...

Who said this?

Football fans

Eye says

It's not a mystery to young Friends

Quaker oaths

Who did you say you were?

An unwavering campaigner Suggest a link

Enter your Email to subscribe to free Eye newsletter (separate from Friend subscriptions)


Powered by FeedBlitz

Powered by Blogger

Independent Quaker journalism since 1843