Skip navigation

Discover the contemporary Quaker way

Letters – 2 April 2010

31 03 2010 | by The Friend | Read 541 times
Correspondence
Military intervention
There was a time when Quakers were known for plain speaking. ‘War’ is, I think, a fairly common word of the English language that is sufficiently well understood by most people. Here’s a clue: ask any child, what do you call it when the armies of different countries are fighting each other? No prizes for guessing what answer you will get! To claim that the military invasion of Iraq was not a ‘war’ either indicates an astonishing level of denial or else a degree of ‘spin’ that I think would have made even the Blair government blush.

On one thing, however, we can wholeheartedly agree. ‘Organised theft’? You bet your life it was! Just look at the western oil corporations now elbowing their way in to take the ‘concessions’ that have – entirely predictably – come up for grabs. It is worth quoting the words of Alan Greenspan, the respected veteran former chairman of the US Federal Reserve: ‘I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil’.

But then, what did he know?
Peter F Bolwell
You need to login to view the rest of this article and comment on it

If you don't have an account you can register here

Subscribe to The Friend

Many reasons to subscribe:

  1. Get The Friend first every week
  2. Become a part of the Quaker community
  3. Prices start from just £48 per year
  4. Get a FREE trial of the new website

Subscribe

Most viewed

Most commented