Letters - 21 August 2026
'In essentials unity, in non-essentials liberty, in all things charity.'
Community standards
Friends who post comments on thefriend.org are deemed to have consented to our community standards, which can be found in our Terms & Conditions. Please familiarise yourself with these ten simple guidelines so that we can keep thefriend.org a safe, respectful and inclusive platform for discussion.
Comments breaching these standards will be removed, and persistent breaching of these standards will result in the comment facility on the letters page being suspended.
Reparations and racism
I would like to respond to Mark Frankel’s letter of 31 July.
Mark’s sweeping dismissal of the Reparations Working Group’s (RWG) document reminds me of my own journey. I can so identify with Mark’s position, from when I was a bit younger.
In the 1980s I worked in the probation service. Of the 200 or so staff in our service, not one of us was a person of colour. Of course, we said, we didn’t have a problem with racism. It was never raised as an issue in our everyday work, so what was the fuss about?
It took someone from outside our area to gently point out that about twenty per cent of the inmates of the three prisons in our area were people of colour, and why might that be? And, of course, we hadn’t kept any figures about what proportion of the people we were working with were people of colour either. Might that not suggest that we may need to give the matter some consideration?
Looking back now, I see that startling experience as the beginning of my own journey through racism. My journey has included, for instance, fortuitously visiting ‘slave forts’ in west Africa, and working briefly in the Caribbean. Only gradually (and, I admit, often painfully) have I become aware of what happened to people if they survived becoming enslaved and then survived the Atlantic crossing, before being sold for their labour.
More recently my learning has come from David Olusoga’s television work, and reading Corinne Fowler’s Our Island Stories, for instance.
I have followed with interest the growing awareness of Friends about these matters. This is taking us well beyond the simplistic, self-righteous assertion that, because some Quakers became involved in the anti-slavery movement, we should now somehow be exempt from scrutiny.
I know that I have a good deal further to go. To approach these difficult issues with humility and open-mindedness, listening to others’ experiences and not closing down on new perspectives, seems right, if I can keep trying.
The work being done by Friends in the RWG, and Lancaster and Bristol Friends in continuing to research and learn, is necessary. And I, for one, am grateful for their assiduous attention to their learning, and to their bringing findings to our notice. They are simply asking that we hear, reflect and act accordingly.
Brian Fellowes
Membership and welcome
I read with joy George Penaluna’s words about becoming ‘part of the whole’ (17 July). George writes about how Quaker membership found him, in 1990.
This year’s Quaker Week theme is ‘Coming to worship’. Woodbrooke events speak of a ‘radical welcome’ of newcomers to our Meetings. I think George’s article and Quaker outreach have a parallel theme: how worship finds us; how membership finds us.
In 2026, Discovering Quakers will be offering a fifteen-minute taster of silent worship, repeatedly, and Taunton Meeting, as part of its plans, will have an open door. Silent worship says a thousand words.
Stories of journeys into membership are so compelling. Discovering Quakers, in its weekly online hour for Quaker seekers, includes a story for a quarter of the time. Might the Friend print some stories about people joining Quakers?
Rhiannon Grant, the Quaker author and researcher, says that Quakers should be active with their invitations. George’s story has times when he was nearly excluded from service. Woodbrooke’s radical welcome proposes that every Quaker step should be welcoming and nonjudgmental.
Why should Quaker membership ‘find’ people? For each new Quaker, we become better, and more sustainable. Ben Pink Dandelion wrote in Open For Transformation that ‘Quakers are better together’. We have no creeds. The best description of a Quaker, for those who want to find out more about us, is that a Quaker is someone who shares in Quaker worship.
Might our new book of discipline be augmented by the revision committee to reflect George, Rhiannon, Woodbrooke and Young Quakers’ thinking? Could our words of welcome adopt this radicalism?
Underpinning this all is a phrase I heard in ministry at our Local Meeting last month: there should be more ‘adoration of each other’.
David Fish
